AAA Rubric

​ 

Exemplary​ 

Good​ 

In Progress​ 

Mission​ 

• Clear and concise.​ 
• Specific to the unit (identifies what separates the unit from other units).​ 
• Addresses the larger impact of the​ program.​ 
• Identifies key partners, collaborators & community members.​ 
• Aligned with the college and division​ 
mission and with respective professional​ 
organization, if applicable.​ 

• Statement of the program's purpose and who it serves.​ 
• Aligned with the college and division mission statements.​ 
• Scope and reach may be limited.​ 

• General statement of the intent of the​ 
program.​ 
• Identifies the functions performed but​ 
not the greater purpose.​ 
• Does not identify stakeholders.​ 
• No clear alignment with college or division mission.​ 
• Too general to distinguish the unit or too specific to encompass the entire mission.​ 

Outcomes​ 

• Observable and measurable.​ 
• May be discipline-specific or specific to an accreditor standard (academic)​ 
• Clearly linked to core mission and function of the unit.​ 
• Uses action verbs.​ 
• Align with college and university goals and with professional organizations, where applicable.​ 

• Observable and measurable.​ 
• Encompass the mission of the program and/or the central principles of the discipline.​ 
• Appropriate, but language may be vague or need revision.​ 

• Describe a process, rather than an outcome (i.e. language focuses on what the program does, rather than what the​ 
student learns).​ 
• Incomplete - not addressing the breadth of knowledge, skills, or services associated with the program (academic)​ 
• Outcomes identified don't seem important/aligned with the program mission.​ 

Measures​ 

• Multiple measures for some or all outcomes.​ 
• Direct and indirect measures used​ 
• Instruments reflect good research methodology.​ 
• Feasible - existing practices used where possible; at least some measures apply to multiple outcomes.​ 
• Purposeful - clear how results could be used for program improvement.​ 
• Described with sufficient detail.​ 

• At least 1 measure or measurement approach per outcome.​ 
• Direct and indirect measures are utilized.​ 
• Described with sufficient detail.​ 
• Implementation may still need further planning.​ 

• Not all outcomes have associated measures.​ 
• Few or no direct measures used.​ 
• Methodology is questionable.​ 
• Instruments are vaguely described; may not be developed yet.​ 
• Do not seem to capture the "end of experience" effect of the curriculum/program.​ 

Targets​ 

• Aligned with measures and outcomes.​ 
• Represent a reasonable level of success.​ 
• Specific and measurable.​ 
• Meaningful - based on benchmarks, previous results, existing standards.​ 

• Aligned with measures and outcomes.​ 
• Target identified for each measure.​ 
• Specific and measurable.​ 
• Some targets may seem arbitrary.​ 

• Targets have not been identified for every measure  or seem off-base (too low/high).​ 
• Language is vague or subjective (e.g. "improve", "satisfactory") making it difficult to tell if met.​ 
• Aligned with assessment process rather than results (e.g. survey return rate, number of papers reviewed).​ 

Results 

• Appropriate data collection/analysis. 

• Align with the language of the corresponding achievement target. 

• Provide solid evidence that targets were 

met, partially met, or not met. 

• Supporting documentation (rubrics, 

surveys, more complete reports*, etc.) are included in the document repository. 

• Address whether targets were met. 

• May contain too much or too little detail or stray slightly from intended data set. 

• Incomplete or too much information. 

• Not clearly aligned with achievement 

targets. 

• Questionable conclusion about whether 

targets were met, partially met, or not met. 

• Questionable data collection/analysis; may 

"gloss over" data to arrive at conclusion. 

• Does not provide data aligned with the 

measures. 

Actions 

• Proposed actions clearly follow from 

assessment results and directly state which finding(s) was used to develop the improvement. 

• Identifies an area that needs to be monitored, remediated, or enhanced and defines logical "next steps." 

• Contains completion dates. 

• At least one proposed improvement in place. 

• Uses "Maintain Assessment Strategy" for all measures. 

 

• No actions selected for each measure